Voices of Smoke-free Communities

All have been impacted by secondhand smoke (SHS), whether we have a loved one who has been harmed by SHS or we have health problems from SHS exposure ourselves.

No one should have to choose between their health and a paycheck.

The debate is over. The science is clear. Secondhand smoke is deadly.

Smoke-free laws protect the public health, saving lives while creating only a minor inconvenience to smokers.

Smoke-free improves lives.

Only comprehensive smoke-free laws provide all workers with clean air.

Most people support smoke-free policies; Kentucky communities and surrounding states with smoke-free policies love the results.

The Debate is over, the science is clear: secondhand smoke is a serious public health threat.

Experience with smoke-free laws shows they are popular and effective.

Local elected officials talk about doing the right thing to protect their constituents.

No one should have to risk their health to earn a paycheck.

Smoke-free laws do not negatively affect business.

Smoke-free improves lives.

Opposition to smoke-free laws downplays the health issue by reframing the debate around personal or business rights.

Smoke-free protects health and improves the quality of life.